PUBBLICAZIONE PUB MED: Scrambler therapy efficacy and safety for neuropathic pain correlated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in adolescents: A preliminary study – Febbraio 2018

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Apr 6:e27064. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27064. [Epub ahead of print]

Scrambler therapy efficacy and safety for neuropathic pain correlated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in adolescents: A preliminary study.

Author information

1
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
2
Haematology Oncology Department, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
3
Scientific Direction, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
4
Pediatric Emergency Department, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of chemotherapy, in need of effective treatment. Preliminary data support the efficacy of scrambler therapy (ST), a noninvasive cutaneous electrostimulation device, in adults with CIPN. We test the efficacy, safety, and durability of ST for neuropathic pain in adolescents with CIPN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

We studied nine pediatric patients with cancer and CIPN who received ST for pain control. Each patient received 45-min daily sessions for 10 consecutive days as a first step, but some of them required additional treatment.

RESULTS:

Pain significantly improved comparing Numeric Rate Scale after 10 days of ST (9.22 ± 0.83 vs. 2.33 ± 2.34; P < 0.001) and at the end of the optimized cycle (EOC) (9.22 ± 0.83 vs. 0.11 ± 0.33, P < 0.001). The improvement in quality of life was significantly reached on pain interference with general activity (8.67 ± 1.66 vs. 3.33 ± 2.12, P < 0.0001), mood (8.33 ± 3.32 vs. 2.78 ± 2.82, P < 0.0005), walking ability (10.00 vs. 2.78 ± 1.22, P < 0.0001), sleep (7.56 ± 2.24 vs. 2.67 ± 1.41, P < 0.001), and relations with people (7.89 ± 2.03 vs. 2.11 ± 2.03, P < 0.0002; Lansky score 26.7 ± 13.2 vs. 10 days of ST 57.8 ± 13.9, P < 0.001; 26.7 ± 13.2 vs. EOC 71.1 ± 16.2, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Based on these preliminary data, ST could be a good choice for adolescents with CIPN for whom pain control is difficult. ST caused total relief or dramatic reduction in CIPN pain and an improvement in quality of life, durable in follow-up. It caused no detected side effects, and can be retrained successfully. Further larger studies should be performed to confirm our promising preliminary data in pediatric patients with cancer.

© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

KEYWORDS:

adolescent; cancer; electrical pain stimulation; neuropathic pain; peripheral neuropathy; quality of life; scrambler therapy

Commenta la discussione